Not long ago certain facts came to my attention, facts that I found surprising inasmuch as, like many not too-badly-off professionals, surviving if not quite fully prospering in the practice of law, I had somehow missed them for many years, which was especially surprising considering that, although I had completed several college degrees and traveled the world, I had not been confronted with them or been presented with them by my professors at any time.
This came to a head with The Bell Curve. The credentials of the authors Herrnstein & Murray and their highly persuasive presentation of the significance of IQ, or more precisely of the “g factor”, launched me in a wholly unexpected direction. The first fact was the profound life-long significance of “g factor”, or overall intelligence as measured in cognitive processing and problem-solving. The second fact was the revelation that not every group has the same g factor according to measurements devised by cognitive measurement professionals like the late Professor Hernnstein, who was not only a professor of cognitive psychology at Harvard, but chief editor of the top academic journal specializing in measurement of cognition. IOW, Herrnstein was widely acknowledged as the highest authority extant on the subject of measuring cognition. Murray, OTOH, was a specialist in social statistics and sociology and not strictly speaking an academic.
Upon reflection, the fact that no two groups are the same would seem to be not just unarguable but obvious upon a moment’s reflection. If no two people ever have the exact same height, weight, personality, and intelligence, then no two groups–however they may be defined–could possibly have the exact same characteristics either. Every group will vary. The odds of all members of a mammalian species that is subject to biological adaptation to varied environments over millennia having the same characteristics, including intelligence, is like that of a baseball passing through a solid wall. Possible according to quantum mechanics, but so unlikely as probably not to occur anywhere in the observable universe. Diversity in g factor is as certain among humans as diversity in skin and hair color, and as permanent. Therefore, the most fundamental presumption of liberals, that every group has the same intellectual capacity and was born with a ‘blank slate’, is simply wrong.
H&M’s hypothesis, drawn from massively documented and intimately described statistical measures that g factor plays a significant role in all manner of social ills, was eye-opening. Their third point–in fact, a minor part of their book The Bell Curve–was more than eye-opening, it was a revelation: African-Americans not only score substantially lower than non-blacks on average on virtually all trustworthy statistical measures by approximately one standard deviation, but also correlate higher than non-blacks in every measure of social ill. Too many to list here, but most notably in violent crime. The hypothesis, not actually clearly stated in the book, was that the lower average IQ of blacks plays a role in their higher crime rates and poverty rates. Never in all my many hundreds of hours of college courses from six major universities and three college degrees had these facts ever come to my attention. Thus the common retort “Whites do it too” is nothing but a feeble attempt at “Howaboutism”, totally lacking in validity.
A final nail in the coffin of my prior Libertarian perspective and my growing distrust of formal college education was the realization from The Bell Curve that IQ tests are not culturally biased since when IQ tests are refashioned to remove all verbal cues and made purely abstract, the IQ spread between blacks and non-blacks becomes higher. IOW, if IQ tests are culturally biased–a familiar claim by those unfamiliar with such testing–it is in favor of blacks and enables them to score higher than otherwise. Therefore, IQ tests do not score high merely for those who are good at taking tests, but must measure something more fundamental, the elusive g factor.
This post was not supposed to be a tell-all on How Yours Truly lurched to the Right-Wing, but TBC opened my mind to unexpected horizons and reinforced an outlook that had been percolating for years due to writers such as George Gilder. Consuming another few hundred books, I gradually came to realize that the West was under siege, and not merely by the growing incidence of black street crime, studiously ignored by the monopolized mainstream media, but all of its institutions from education to governmental bodies.
The truth is that the West is under assault by a fanatical, violent religion that has declared war on every vestige of Western civilization, a war primarily on people of European descent. This means indigenous Europeans and every person of European descent who lives outside of Europe. No place that contains Whites–shorthand for people of predominantly European descent–is immune from this attack that has the genocide of Whites as its goal. The religion has slogans that amount to catechisms: “Diversity is our strength”, “Our Democracy”, “Black Lives Matter”, “Save the Planet”. These are enforced by force and no debate is possible regarding their desirability.
This violent religion is the PC Cult, for Politically Correct, or, as they sometimes call themselves, the Woke. In my book A Beginners Guide to the PC Cult, I describe the details of this Cult, where it came from, who ‘runs’ it, why the cultists act the way they do, and the philosophical and historical underpinnings of its founding, including Communism, Cultural Marxism, and the ideas of Nietzsche, and why the Cult has similarities to 19th century Millerite revivals.
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 GLOBAL NATURE OF THE CULT 9
3 WHITE GENOCIDE 12
4 THE PARTY LINE 21
5 THE MARKETING MACHINE 36
6 THE ROLE OF ETHNICITY 52
7 HOLLYWOOD 58
8 ACADEMIA 82
9 ORIGINS OF THE CULT 99
10 MAIN FACETS OF THE CULT 110
11 SOCIALISM & COMMUNISM 142
12 WHERE HAVE ALL THE CHRISTIANS GONE? 152
13 JUDAISM & ISLAM 177
14 AFTERTHOUGHTS: THE CORONAVIRUS 189
15 BIBLIOGRAPHY 193
Members of the Cult are sometimes termed Social Justice Warriors. SJWs adhere to an ideology of biological and racial identity. The key to understanding their behavior is to realize that, in their highly media-conditioned outlook, melanin is sacred and can do no wrong, while Whiteness–a ‘disease’ stemming from lack of sacred melanin–is the new Original Sin. Unlike Christian Original Sin, which can be removed by atonement, in the PC Cult, Whiteness is permanent because it is rooted in biology and cannot be changed. Therefore Whites can never atone for their sin since their sin is racial and cannot be altered. The Cult’s God(dess) is Mother Earth, modernized as ‘Environmentalism’. Blacks are the sacred Chosen People of Mother Earth. Just as Christ was killed by sinful pagans, Mother Earth has been or is about to be killed by sinful Whites. Whiteness is Chaos and Death and Whites can only atone by not reproducing; Blackness is fecund and of-the-Earth and blacks have a duty to propagate and to destroy White heretics and remove their Whiteness wherever they are found–by any means whatever, including by crime and violence.
If one does not understand that we are in a new War of Religion and that all Whites are heretics whose very existence is seen as intolerable blasphemy–even if only one side yet realizes that it is at war–then one understands nothing about the modern West. One will remain confused and continue to seek an illusory peace by repeated compromises while one is subjected to the increasing oppression of the new “Spanish Inquisition” of the Woke PC Cult, which has become the official state religion of not just the U.S. but of most of Europe, and has available the machinery of the state in its goal of genociding heretical Whites.
– – –
Excerpt from CHAPTER 10:
“One of the peculiarities of the Cult is a perception, deriving from Nietzsche, that there is no such thing as objectivity. Beginning with Kant and developed by Hegel, both Marx and Nietzsche, from opposite political orientations, attacked the notion of independent objectively verifiable facts. Marx proclaimed that individual consciousness was determined by class consciousness, with the individual’s ideas and outlook and values entirely formed by that individual’s class.
Nietzsche insisted that if objective facts exist at all, they are either unknowable or are useless to humans, consciousness and so-called Free Will being nothing more than unpredictable and obscure physiological processes. As the chief proponents of Marxism in Europe, Ashkenazi Jews used their ownership of Europe’s leading newspapers to popularize Marxism, while absorbing Nietzsche’s ideas in the background by osmosis.
When Jews came to America, they brought both Marx and Nietzsche with them, teaching that free will did not exist and that objectivity was impossible and that therefore professors should no longer aspire to intellectual independence but should embrace their prejudices and be proud of them.
This is how speech became ‘violence’ in the minds of SJWs. Because if truth does not exist – only prejudice – then discussion is no longer a way to discover truth, but merely a deceptive way of disguising one’s bias and bigotry, subtly exercising privilege and power over others. Thus, the PC Cult’s focus on ‘safe spaces’ where speech-as-violence (not to be confused with violent speech) is banned and the evil heretics who commit speech-as-violence by the ‘microaggression’ of opening their mouths and stating their opinions are silenced, excommunicated, and expelled.
Voting is per se illegitimate in the eyes of SJWs. Voting, after all, is only a form of speech, so voting is also nothing more than a deceptive way of disguising the speaker’s hate and prejudice and his exercise of illegitimate power and must also be suppressed. SJWs do not elect their leaders by majority vote – they are chosen by ‘Intersectionality’, which means measuring candidates by their degree of melanin and non-heterosexual-maleness. The only ‘communicating’ that SJWs do is with baseball bats and their preferred ‘voting’ is to stuff fake absentee ballots into unsupervised boxes at 3:00 A.M.
The election of Congressmen and -women, who might commit the cardinal sin of compromising PC Cult values once they arrive in Congress, is no more acceptable to SJWs and their Intersectional Cult than would be popular election of their professorial priesthood in the hierarchy of academia, or popular election of the Cult’s representatives on the Supreme Court. To SJWs, popular elections are by their nature sinful because they violate the sacred principles of Diversity and Intersectionality. Therefore, free and open elections must be avoided whenever possible.
If forced to participate in a majority-vote election, Cultists believe the results should be rigged as happened in 2020 and more routinely in places like California. And if forced to accept the actual results of a majority-vote election – but losing – then the results should be canceled by the Cult’s backstop SJW judges in the federal judiciary on the pretext that the results were unconstitutional, i.e., violated Diversity and Intersectionality by ‘suppressing the vote’ of some unidentified ‘people of color’.
Just as any Orders issued by a President who was elected in an election that the Cult’s candidate lost to must be resisted or ignored. PC values always trump majority-vote elections, including any executive branch orders that may follow such elections. The PC Cult accepts the results of votes and of any other legalistic governmental processes established by the Constitution only if they win. They then celebrate the ‘triumph of Our Democracy’ and the ‘restoration of our Constitution’ that had been ‘threatened’ by evil white males – but only as an exercise in public relations. Like with the PC Cultist Hillary Clinton in 2016, the duty to abide by the results of an election applies only to heretics and Untouchables, never to SJWs themselves.”